Banned Book Week 2008
This week, from September 27 – October 4, is the 2008 Banned Book Week. Banned Book Week’s mission is to bring public attention to banned books, the infringement of our First Amendment rights, and celebrate, above all, the beauty of literature in it’s diversity. Overall, Banned Books Week’s purpose is to remind American’s not to take our liberties for granted1. I support Banned Book Week.
For me, Banned Book Week is a reminder that there are those who would strive to rob others of their rights as Americans. When a person or group of people takes it upon themselves to challenge books and have them banned, they are depriving others of their right to access that material. The First Amendment to the constitution grants us the right to freedom of expression and press, every American has the right to read whatever s/he chooses and to make that impossible by the banning of literature is adverse to the very fundamentals of the American system of liberty. If it offends you so, simply don’t read it, but it is immoral and unconstitutional to force others to be deprived the right to chose for themselves what may or may not offend them. Your license2 extends only so far as it doesn’t deprive another of their liberty, it’s a fundamental idea, put more eloquently into words than I could ever dream by John Stewart Mill in On Liberty, and it applies here, to this circumstance.
So, who is it trying to take away our rights? Generally, it’s parents with school age children, Jr. high and high school students, educators, and school administrators. These people, out of offense by certain types of literature, their religious or racial objections to said literature, personal prejudices, or some misguided attempt to pander to any of the above groups, will challenge books before their school boards and/or city government to have the books removed from school and/or public libraries.
The difference, according to the ALA, between a challenged book and a banned book is in the actions taken. The ALA says…
A challenge is an attempt to remove or restrict materials, based upon the objections of a person or group. A banning is the removal of those materials.
They go on to explain that a challenge is not simply an opinion. I could give my opinion, on this blog, about a certain book, but that wouldn’t make the book challenged. A challenge is an out right attempt at having a book banned, and all the actions one takes in that endeavor.
The top five most challenged books from 2000-2007 are:
1 Harry Potter, J.K. Rowling
2 Alice series, Phyllis Reynolds Naylor
3 The Chocolate War, Robert Cormier
4 Of Mice and Men, John Steinbeck
5 I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, Maya Angelou
Other notable banned books include: The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain, The Color Purple by Alice Walker, To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee, The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger, Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury and Grendel by John Gardner. The complete list of challenged/banned books from 2000-2007 can be found here.
If you’re interested in learning more about Banned Book Week, why books are banned, or how you can participate in the Banned Book Week activities in your community, please see the American Library Associations website at http://ala.org or your local community library or college webpage. Above all else, take the time to read this week and celebrate your constitutional right to do so.
…(¨`·.·´¨)
…..`·.¸.·Kristyn
- http://www.ala.org/ala/aboutala/offices/oif/bannedbooksweek/backgroundb/background.cfm#wabc ↩
- The Oxford English Dictionary defines License as, “To allow liberty, free range, or scope to; to privilege, tolerate.” ↩
RSS
Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Linkedin
Twitter